Lab Overview

The main focus of the lab is to try and understand the neural mechanisms that support our ability to remember the things that have happened to us – episodic memory. Most of our work takes a systems neuroscience approach to examine how networks within the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex process memory information.  We use in vivo electrophysiology to examine firing patterns of individual neurons as lab rats carry out memory tasks. We also use molecular and genetic tools to manipulate the network and understand the cellular mechanisms underlying episodic memory.

Complimenting the neuroscientific approach, other lines of research in the lab examine the cognitive mechanisms underlying episodic memory in humans. Ultimately we aim to apply this work by using our knowledge of mammalian memory networks to help test therapeutic strategies for disorders of memory such as Alzheimer’s disease. Current on-going research projects in the lab include:

Grid Cells’ Role in Path Integration

Grid cells are distorted in a trapezoid (left). Distance estimation testing (right) from Duncan et al. (2025)

There are many ways in which we can navigate around the world. We can use cues like mountains or buildings or we can use our internal sense of direction and distance travelled. This internal sense of distance and direction supports a process called path integration which allows us to navigate when cues are either unavailable (when it dark or it is very foggy) or unfamiliar (new places).

Grid cells in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) show strikingly regular firing patterns with peaks of activity occurring at very regular intervals as a rat runs through an environment. Our work shows that this regularity is related to rat’s ability to judge distance. If we place the rat in a trapezoid shaped box the grid regularity is distorted and the extent of that distortion is correlated with the ability of the rat to judge distance. The more distorted the grid the worse the rat is at judging distance.

Increased Neurogenesis is Associated with Improved Pattern Separation

The hippocampus is one of the only regions of the brain where new neurons are generated in adults (neurogenesis). These newborn neurons are important for memory and increased numbers of them improves memory. We have recently shown that they are particularly important for difficult memory problems. Try and remember what you had for dinner on Friday two weeks ago. That is a very difficult memory problem as there are hundreds of very similar memories that need to be inhibited to allow you to accurately remember the answer. We have shown that rats with more newborn neurons are better at these diffcult memory problems.

Interestingly, increasing excercise and living in a more complex social and physical world (often called environmental enrichment) increases neurogenesis. In separate lines of research we are examining how increasing the number of newborn neurons changes the memory system.

Newborn neurons in the hippocampus. See Ventura et al. (2024).

Lateral Entorhinal Cortex and Associative Recognition Memory

While it is well known that the hippocampus supports episodic memory in humans and animals our understanding of how the network of structures surrounding the hippocampus contributes to this cognitive function is less well understood. In recent years we have been using in vivo single unit recording and immediate early gene imaging studies combined with molecular and genetic tools to examine the role of one of the main interfaces between the hippocampus and neocortex, the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC).

Our studies suggest a new role for LEC in associative memory for combinations of features of an event. Trying to remember where you left your keys or where you parked your car? Your LEC will be helping you remember the combination of object and the context in which it was experienced.

LEC and Spatial Cognition

Spatial tasks used in Kuruvilla & Ainge 2017 and Kuruvilla et al. 2020

How do we know where we are? How do find our way around in familiar places? The answer to these questions is that we use cognitive maps which give us mental representations of places we have visited. The hippocampus is critically involved in cognitive mapping and place cells (see examples at the top of the page) are the basic building block of cognitive maps.

In recent years we have explored how inputs from LEC to the hippocampus contribute to our ability to know where we are. We have designed a number of behavioural tasks that examine the ability of rats and mice to navigate using different types of spatial cues. We have shown that LEC is important for understanding local features/cues that we can interact with but less so for large scale global features/cues. LEC is also important for first person (egocentric) spatial frameworks as well as world centred (allocentric) frameworks.

Consistent with findings covered above LEC is critical for allowing us to associate multiple features of environment together.

LEC input creates more precise memory for object locations

Object cells in Vandrey 2021

Place cells receive input from both lateral (LEC) and medial entorhinal cortex (MEC). However, place cells in some parts of the hippocampus receive much more input from LEC and other receive more input from MEC. Given our work showing that LEC is critical for integrating information about objects and the locations in which they are experienced, Vandrey et al. 2021 examined whether place cells getting LEC input are especially sensitive to object locations.

We found that place cells receiving LEC inputs have more precise spatial firing and also fire closer to objects. We also report object memory cells that encode where objects have been previously experienced. Object memory cells that receive LEC input are also more precise than those receiving MEC input.

Time vs. Context

How do we remember specific events? How is it possible that we can remember hundreds of very similar events that occur in the same location (how many meetings have I had in my office?!)? One way of disambiguating events is to encode the time at which they happened as this is a unique piece of information that can separate each memory from other memories. However, humans are not very good at remembering specific times and dates and as such we rely on other contextual cues that were present during the event (who was there, what the weather was like). Current experiments are asking which neural mechanisms allow is to remember time and contextual information from specific experiences.

Our recent findings call into question the suggestion that context and time are used interchangbly to remember episodes by showing that they can be supported by different retrieval mechanisms.

Episodes presented in different contextual and temporal settings from Persson et al. 2016. See also Kuruvilla et al. 2020

Translating rodent and human memory research

Eye-tracking protocol from Sivakumaran et al. 2018. Scientific Reports

One very commonly used test of memory in lab rats is the novel object recognition paradigm. This works by making use of rodents’ natural propensity to explore novel objects and assumes that memory for familiar objects supports this novelty seeking behaviour. However, the translation of findings from these rodent studies relies on the assumption that humans and rats use the same memory mechanisms when carrying out this type of task. We are adapting rodent tasks for humans and vice versa to ask whether we are testing the same cognitive processes in both species.

Some of our recent work in humans using eye tracking and standard recognition memory protocols has validated the novel object recognition paradigm by demonstrating it is well correlated with memory sensitivity and not bias.

Leptin and Episodic Memory

Recent studies have suggested that irregularities in the system controlling the hormone leptin are linked with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Leptin levels are reduced in AD patients and leptin has been shown to reduce b-amyloid (Ab) and tau phosphorylation, 2 hallmarks of AD pathology, in animal models of AD. However, we do not know how leptin affects the debilitating cognitive decline in AD which is characterised by deficits in memory, attention, language and spatial orientation in its final stages.

Our recent experiments have shown that leptin upregulates memory mechanisms within the hippocampus and improves episodic memory in mice. On-going studies are examining whether small fragments of the leptin molecule could be a useful therapeutic target for AD.

Increased GluR1 staining in leptin treated neurons from Malekizadeh et al. 2017. See also Doherty et al. 2023